Were there any signs of disagreement between them? He seemed to think that you both had some kind of argument — or disagreements, you know. Hermione remembered it and realized that his silence had been caused by his disagreement. If there had been a disagreement, it immediately disappeared with this misadventure. However, there are situations in which the parties involved must choose a particular interpretation. For example, there may be only one prize to be awarded to the best student, so it is necessary to choose between the two definitions to decide whether Cindy or Betty should receive the award. This is therefore the second way to resolve a verbal dispute with two definitions – we opt for a precise definition by looking very carefully at the function it should serve. If, in the example on the exam, you have to choose between teacher definitions A and B, which you will choose the definition of and why? Hirsch, E. (2005). The physical-ontology ontology of verbal and common sense conflicts.
Philosophy and phenomenological research, 70, 67-98. But it was how she sought, as she would, that the real subject of disagreements eluded her. After all, maybe it`s nothing essential, it`s just a disagreement between the girls. But then again, the disagreement is much less than one imagines. This leaves the possibility that the other conditions will not be met. For example, there could be a prima facie dispute that involves acting on insignificant words, for which the appearance of differences of opinion is due to means other than the different uses of language. Thanks to Jonathan Schaffer for making me think about these cases. This should not deny that it is possible to further improve the MVD by clarifying more clearly the type of statement to be reported by the phrase of the „owing to“ explanation marker in MVD. It seems that there may still be cases similar to the Fred/Freda case, where there is a strange explanation link between the different languages of the parties and the emergence of differences of opinion, but in which we do not want to conclude that the parties are content with a verbal quarrel. However, we have at least made progress in excluding some of the more immediate problems of this type. Indeed, this is a case in which I believe that the term „simple verbal confrontation“ is applicable in some contexts, but not in others.
For more information, see point 5 below. The main issues were the root causes. Verbal conflicts often arise from factual conflicts where differences of opinion are linked to differences of opinion on facts, not on importance. If anyone thinks That Sydney is the capital of Australia and others disagree, the disagreement is objective. So who`s right and who`s wrong? In a way, both teachers are right because they seem to be working with two different definitions of „best students.“ For Teacher A, the best student is the one with the highest average score. For Teacher B, the best student is someone with the highest number of A grades. Clearly, the student who meets the first definition should not be the same as the student who meets the second definition. This is an example of a purely verbal confrontation where the obvious disagreement is not due to a disagreement on the facts, but to a different understanding of the meaning of a key concept or concept.